Invitation Party Paying For Own Food

REQUIRED BY THE SPANISH SITUATION KRUGMAN

Good old Paul Krugman, I remember him because we were still the World Economy in the first manual of economics back in the Pleistocene, say year 1983/1984. Here is his view on the situation of the English economy, for me a teacher.

http://www.elpais.com/articulo/economia/prisionero/espanol/elpepueco/20101129elpepueco_3/Tes

Could Cats Survive Parvo?

some time reflect on the metaphor that every generation (10 / 15 years) at birth rises a train and travels through life with similar parameters, the next or previous generation have risen in other mills and face or enjoy different climates, sometimes trains are stopped, the passengers are reported by the windows, but follow his ways . The other day a colleague of 29 years spoke of his generation as the Lost Generation: infinitely more prepared than previous generations, and encouraged by the economic boom, now passing through a harsh reality: unemployment, semi-slave contracts, insecurity, jobs filled by other generations, crisis management. But I say: "Nobody said life would be easy," that you ask real lost generations: the of the 1 st and 2 nd World War, the fifth of the bottle is Spain (Mili in the Republic, Civil War, Mili with Franco, and often jail and field concetración) Ukrainians and intellectuals at the time of Stalin, the English exiles , etc. And although they were not lost generations, was not easy the lives of those who grew up in postwar generations or late 70's, early 80's. In summary the picture of prosperity, easy profits, interesting and well paid jobs, whims continuous consumption of luxury and happy life, it's strange in the history of what it seemed. Touch roll up, fight, find, get out, work in precarious, that is, others have done, perhaps the hardest thing is to move from easy to hard, but man has been yet in the story is more common during times of difficulty boom. Encouragement.

Criminal Court 120-55 Queens Blvd

RETIREMENT LOST GENERATION TO FOOL THE LAST 67 OR FAIR PENSIONS



smart-ass in this country and espabilaos, we now propose as the solution to the problem of payment of pensions that will generate the aging population, retirement at age 67, very good, and when approved by Political wonderful that we begin to scroll through the exceptions will retire at 67 all workers except police officers, firefighters, soldiers, sailors, miners, drivers, boxes banking and early retirees, farmers, teachers, etc, etc, etc, and silly the last, we'll see the enlightened who meet that age, perhaps vocational work as doctors, or professors college (2 or 3 hours of class per week). Why not maintain formal age 65?, And try to make the actual age is closer to that figure, or to calculate lifetime employment and require a minimum years of contributions, as in France, and from there you retire when you want. How ever, the politicians will impose the theoretical sacrifice, and the city look like slip, good school was the defunct military shirking, the generations that have not been expected to be more ethical.

Lia Sophia Jewelry Party Invitation

Fair is always beautiful, no discussion, what's wrong when a copper depending on what contribution? I do not understand. After seeing an entire generation of workers born in the 30 and 40, removed from the labor market by the crisis of the early 80's, who had worked since childhood, and carried forward until retirement to collect the minimum pension, having contributed for decades, and others against unglued stick to water or collect pension contributions more substantial about getting the bargain of quoting the most recent years prior to retirement, what they are telling me?, why charge someone opposes according to lifetime contributions?. Otherwise only generates asymmetric situations and unjust, where the autonomous power that has adapted their behavior to maximize their contribution. In contrast to explain that the system was cast, the young people were more paid to the elderly who were less, but now with the structure of current and future population that is impossible. Have value when politicians and Explain, do not rise in minimum pensions only, do not favor the rogue, do not sell goats. That each receives a pension based on their contributions under the working life, this is fair, the rest is another story.

Monster Truck Rubber Bracelet

WHAT DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY? Entrepreneur

Democracy (Greek word meaning government of the people) was conceived in ancient Greece, in a slave society where only aristocrats were voted and elected a modified model followed in Rome. After the dark Middle Ages, Britain, France and America, the bases with an illustration of a more or less democratic after achievement of universal suffrage to all races and social positions, and later for women full twentieth-century modern democracy in the Western world. But here while the full model in this century, we analyzed the 3 elements: 1) voters, in principle all, but lack of interest in politics leads to brutal abstention rates (in the U.S. only 40% rate), 2) the chosen : belonging to a species of sects (games) with almost no internal criticism, where civil strife and the disqualify the other party is above the construction of an ideology, preferably also seeks to spread the vote between two of these parties, and transmit the voter with the idea of \u200b\u200bgood and bad, and there are only two options, 3) the electoral system: the major parties mounted systems which benefit the two-party election, and the unequal power of each vote, depending on the territory and the party who votes, and in Valencia, establishing a limit of 5% of votes in voting makes about 80,000 votes a party has neither an MP, from these two majority votes, with just 20,000 votes earn an additional member (shame), and at another level one vote in Teruel, or in the Basque Country is worth more than one vote in a big city, ie one man one vote (but worth all men equal? .) In the end, with 20% of the voting stock in a country made by a party and well distributed can govern with an absolute majority. Should not we rethink what of democracy as a tool and how improve the actors and the system of choice?