Fair is always beautiful, no discussion, what's wrong when a copper depending on what contribution? I do not understand. After seeing an entire generation of workers born in the 30 and 40, removed from the labor market by the crisis of the early 80's, who had worked since childhood, and carried forward until retirement to collect the minimum pension, having contributed for decades, and others against unglued stick to water or collect pension contributions more substantial about getting the bargain of quoting the most recent years prior to retirement, what they are telling me?, why charge someone opposes according to lifetime contributions?. Otherwise only generates asymmetric situations and unjust, where the autonomous power that has adapted their behavior to maximize their contribution. In contrast to explain that the system was cast, the young people were more paid to the elderly who were less, but now with the structure of current and future population that is impossible. Have value when politicians and Explain, do not rise in minimum pensions only, do not favor the rogue, do not sell goats. That each receives a pension based on their contributions under the working life, this is fair, the rest is another story.
0 comments:
Post a Comment