Monday, March 21, 2011

Headache And Swallen Legs After Pregnancy

lunera Night, Saturday

who raised for a moment looked to the sky could be seen in a Saturday night Luna larger than normal, in particular, almost 15% more voluminous and 30% brighter. The phenomenon is explained. "This is the night where the distance from Earth is minimal, the shortest of the last 18 years" . The usual separation is 384,000 kilometers over the Earth. On Saturday the distance was reduced 354,000.



This event is known as "superluna" and occurs when this approach coincides with the full moon phase . The star is then at its perigee, the closest point of its orbit to Earth. For the first time since 1993 these two factors converged.

However, despite being hard to see, for amateur astronomers, the appointment has no further interest beyond this is a phenomenon that takes many years repeated. You can watch the moon bigger and brighter than ever. And it is this closeness sparked interest in areas where, as in Cadiz, was expected historical tide that caused traffic jams to get to contemplate the fall of the tide. This did not happen in Valencia. In fact, the association is not organized anything special for the occasion.

The spectacle of this phenomenon lies in a optical effect, since in reality the star "only" close to Earth, NASA said, 26,323 miles, but thanks to the star it was seen as through a large magnifying glass. The "superluna" often mistakenly associated with natural disasters or other acts .

The NASA enabled a website to track the phenomenon. But for those who missed the event there is another next to the calendar: October 11 can observe the opposite effect. The satellite is at its apogee, its farthest point, and a display 12.3% smaller.

Then I leave you with two photos taken by Mayor Antonio (my uncle). The first one observes the state of the moon. While in the second, you can see the detail of the cross of the church.





simply AWESOME!

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Discoloration At Opening Of Cervix

double or deformed special relativity.

The relativity general, Einstein's theory of gravity, gives us a useful basis for mathematically model the universe on a large scale - while the quantum theory gives us a useful basis for modeling of particle physics subatomic and the likelihood of small-scale physics of high energy density of the early universe - nanoseconds after the Big Bang - in which general relativity models only as a singularity and has nothing more to say on the matter .
theories of quantum gravity may have more to say, to extend relativity generally within a quantized structure of space-time , it may be that we can bridge the gap between the physics of large-scale and small scale, using eg Double or Deformed Special Relativity ( DSR).
In special relativity conventional two different inertial frames of reference can measure the speed of the same object differently. Therefore, if you're on a train and throws a tennis ball forward you could measure it moving at 10 kilometers per hour. However, another person standing on the station platform railway train passing notes to 60 kilometers per hour, measuring the speed of the ball 60 + 10 - ie 70 miles per hour and both are correct ..
However, as Einstein said, doing the same experiment but with you holding a torch that emits a bright beam, instead of throwing a ball, ahead of the train - the train both you and the person on the platform measure lightning speed of the torch as the speed of light - without affecting the extra 60 miles per hour speed train - and both are right.


the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is intended to provide extraordinary scientific evidence but remains uncertain whether any evidence base to discover the theory of quantum gravity. Credit: CERN.


the Planck satellite observatory exploring the universe with the same name of the founder of quantum theory will be pure coincidence?. Credit: ESA.

For the person on the platform, the velocity components (distance and time) change in the train so that the distances are contracted and dilated time (ie, clocks run slower). And the mathematics of transformations Lorenz, these effects increase as the train goes faster -. It also appears that the mass of the objects in the train increases, so someone could ask if the train could not be converted into a black hole far it reaches the 99.9999 percent of the speed of light (as well as increasing its mass decreases in volume through length contraction)? (See here for more information.)
Now double special relativity, proposed not only the speed of light always remains the same regardless of their framework, but also Planck units of mass and energy are the same. This means that relativistic effects (such as the mass seems to increase in the train) are not produced in the (very small) Planck scale - although on a larger scale, double special relativity should provide results indistinguishable from conventional special relativity .

double special relativity can also be generalized to a theory of quantum gravity-which, when extended to the Planck scale , results should be indistinguishable from general relativity.
turns out that the Planck scale e = m (in units of Planck) even though the macro-scales is e = mc 2 . - And at the Planck scale, a Planck mass equals 2.17645 × 10 -8 kg allegedly egg mass of a flea - and has a Schwarzschild radius a Planck length - which means that if this mass is compressed into such a small volume, would become a black hole containing a very small unit Planck energy.
To put it another way, in the Planck scale, gravity becomes a force quantum physics significant Really though, all we are saying is that there is a Planck unit of gravitational force between two masses of Planck, when separated by a length of Planck -. And by the way, Planck length is the distance light travels in a Planck time unit !.
And since a power unit Planck ( 1.22 × 10 19 GeV ) is considered the maximum energy of the particles - is tempting to consider that this represents the conditions in the Planck epoch , this being a very early stage of Big Bang .
all sounds very exciting, but this line of thought has been criticized for being just a trick to make the math work better by eliminating important information about the physical systems under consideration. Also the risk of undermining the fundamental principles of relativity and conventional, as the study points out below, a Planck length can be considered as a constant independent invariant frame of reference of an observer while the speed of light becomes variable a very high energy densities.
However, since even the Large Hadron Collider not expected to produce direct evidence of what may or may not happen at the Planck scale - for now, make the best mathematical work seems to be the best way forward.





read the study HERE





source of information:




http://www.universetoday.com/84226/astronomy-without-a-telescope "doubly-special-relativity /

Alabama Players Wear 12

"TOWER OF SANTA MARIA OTERO (León)"

"TOWER OF SANTA MARIA OTERO (León)"
Materials used: watercolor pencils, watercolor.
Van Gogh Watercolor Paper Fine grain, 200g/m2 (13,5 x21cm)
March 2011


Scorpio Men And Flirting

"VISTA DE SANTA MARIA DE LOS Otero (León)"

"VISTA DE SANTA MARIA DE THE OTERO (León) "
Materials used: watercolors, watercolor CANSON 300g/m2 Sheet Medium (21x29, 7cm) March 2011